The contact I describe
I received unwanted messages, emails and telephone calls, including calls from a withheld number, which I attribute to Anne-Marie Cissé. I believe Lorenzo shared my private contact information and facilitated that contact.
I have described this conduct as harassment. My concern is the direct contact with me and its effect in the context of the relationship history I have explained. Where involvement is inferred rather than established from a communication, I identify it as my understanding.
The complaint I contest
I contest a complaint against me dated 13 September 2025 concerning harassment and blackmail. I believe it contains false allegations, and I have asked for the complaint and full communication chronology to be examined.
My disagreement with a complaint is my position. I do not present that disagreement as a judicial determination that a person made a false report. The complaint, my response and the surrounding messages need to be read in their stated context.
How this relates to the wider account
I discuss these events alongside my separation from Lorenzo, the divorce proceedings I say I could not participate in and the public statements concerning Lorenzo and CARNI in Noisy-le-Sec. The full account explains those connections.
A shared name or a photograph alone is not enough to attribute a message or a public statement to someone. Sources and the basis for attribution matter when examining the contacts I describe.
The records and relevant responses
The supporting-record section distinguishes material available to view from source descriptions awaiting a public copy. Private addresses, unrelated third-party details and confidential information about children are excluded.
This page can be updated as relevant correspondence is prepared for publication. Responses and corrections should address the specific communication or event so they can be considered with its date and context.